Two years ago this week—less than a fortnight into Pride month—the deadliest incident of violence against LGBT people in the United States struck the gay nightclub, Pulse, in Orlando, Florida.
The lives of forty-nine members of our community were stolen that night and a further fifty-three others were wounded in what was, at the time, the United States’s deadliest mass shooting committed by a single shooter.
As the news story broke worldwide and the victim toll rose, local blood donation centres saw surges in potential donors.
One donor, however, remained unwelcome. As gay men in Orlando learnt of their friends, both fallen and fighting for life, the tragedy was further deepened by the fact that the blood of gay men was not considered worthy of saving their lives.
In the UK, the blanket ban on gay men donating blood dates from the the height of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
The lifetime exclusion was rebranded as a 12-month deferral in late 2011 and as a three-month deferral in late 2017.
The NHS Blood and Transplant website states: “Statistically, men who have sex with men have a higher risk of acquiring blood-borne diseases, infections and viruses.”
It continues, “That is why we can’t collect blood from men who have had oral or anal sex with men, with or without protection, in the last three months.”
Our current blood donor policy, however, does not reflect a concern for public safety.
If it did, our government would have implemented a truly individual risk-based assessment whereby each person is assessed according to their own personal risk.
The post World Blood Donor Day: Why is my gay blood not good enough to save lives? appeared first on PinkNews - Gay news, reviews and comment from the world's most read lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans news service.